The Walking Golfers Society is dedicated to providing information about the many benefits of walking when you golf, which is how the game was intended to be played. If you are a passionate walking golfer then please join our growing Society and help us advocate for the enjoyment of golf as a walking game.
Too many shots to hit on the back 9 for me to look elsewhere. 17 might be the only hole on the back that I don’t have a particular shot I’d like to try. I know it’s cliche but I don’t care, I’m going back 9.
Having not been on property, I’ll go with the front 9. I think the par 5’s are superior. #2, Hard dog leg left rewards angles. The mounding around the 8th green looks great. 13th looks great but the trees left of the green ruin the firmness of the green. 15 has no bailout and the pond looks awful.
Par 3’s on the front I’ll give edge. 6th looks really cool, green looks wonderful. 4th edges out the 16th because putting ponds by greens is hackish imo, cool green.
The biggest omission on the front is the original 7th hole that looked incredible. It may have needed to of been tweaked just slightly.
The 14th looks the most interesting on the back side to play. The green is so bold and it’s bunkerless.
This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by Ben Cowan.